Rechercher dans ce blog

Tuesday, June 30, 2020

Cam Newton to Patriots: What are his injuries, why didn't other teams sign him, how will Pats offense look? - CBS Sports

Bill Belichick signing a former No. 1 overall pick and one-time NFL MVP for a veteran minimum deal in the middle of June feels a little too on brand, but considering he had his dog Nike draft a Division II hybrid defensive back linebacker with his first pick after trading out of the first round, maybe the Patriots coach is just feeling himself this offseason. 

Cam Newton is now a member of the Patriots, a surprisingly obvious conclusion for the last few months. The Patriots clearly believe in Jarrett Stidham, but Newton makes more sense as a replacement for Tom Brady. If he fails to live up to the lofty standards set by the 20-year Patriots quarterback, it means one of two things: Newton wasn't healthy enough to perform or Stidham is good enough to beat out a healthy Cam for the QB1 role. 

Neither of those things is a loss for the Pats at the price tag. This is an upside-filled, no-brainer move for New England. Will it work out? It's literally impossible to know, because Newton's health is an X-factor. 

So let's talk about Cam's health.

What injury is he coming back from? 

There's a common perception about Newton's health and how much he's deteriorated over the last several years. Newton's health is spoken about in a way indicating his body has betrayed him and he's just completely fallen apart. People talk about him as being "broken." It's ridiculous. I absolutely take umbrage here -- Newton has shown multiple times in the last two seasons that he's close to being completely healthy.

Heading into 2018, Newton was at 100 percent. He spent the first eight games of that season playing outstanding football before suffering a shoulder injury against the Steelers in a blowout Thursday Night Football loss. Newton would never be the same until going under the knife in January 2019

It's my belief Newton was completely healed from his shoulder injury that offseason, but no one ever actually saw Newton throw the football much prior to him suffering a foot injury against the Patriots in the preseason. The Panthers downplayed it, but by Week 2 of 2019, something was clearly wrong. Newton re-aggravated the foot injury against Tampa Bay during a 20-14 loss that featured ugly weather. People wanted to focus on his inaccuracy because of the shoulder injury, but it was unquestionably the foot injury causing him to miss throws. Newton hardly stepped into anything that night. 

via NFL Gamepass

It got worse after Newton came up limp late in the first quarter. 

People claim "Cam wasn't ever accurate" and point to the shoulder injury to suggest Cam is toast. Cam completed almost 68 percent of his passes in 2018 and 67.3 percent prior to injuring his shoulder in Norv Turner's offense. He can be accurate in a reasonable offensive system. He wasn't sailing everything against Tampa Bay because of his shoulder -- he couldn't step into anything with a crunked up foot. 

Unfortunately for Cam, there's no guarantee he comes back from foot injury in perfectly smooth fashion. CBS Sports' Brady Quinn and I have talked about this a bunch on the Pick Six Podcast -- Brady suffered a Lisfranc injury when playing in the NFL but didn't have surgery on his foot until about a year ago. Obviously it's not the same issue as Cam, but talking to Brady about it, there are clearly some issues adjusting to life after getting your foot surgically repaired, like how to adjust workouts, overcompensating for the foot injury and some mobility issues. 

Again, I'm not saying Cam will battle those issues, but it would be surprising if the recovery was completely seamless and done with in just six months (he really should have had the foot surgery in October, but that's a whole different story). 

That's precisely why New England convinced Newton to settle on a vet min deal jammed with incentives. 

Why didn't anyone else want Cam?

I got asked this roughly four billion times on the radio Monday in the wake of Newton's deal with the Pats, and a large reason for the skepticism from people examining this deal is New England. Anywhere else with no offers and the anti-Cam crowd -- and buddy is it a large crowd -- is flying out of the woodwork to scream about how he can't be accurate or run an NFL offense, blah, blah, blah. 

The reality of the situation is New England was the only landing spot for the former MVP. Cam wanted a chance to start but couldn't visit anyone for physicals during the early portion of free agency. If you want to play the rule-out game, you can rule out the Dolphins, Bills, Jets, Browns, Texans, Chargers, Bengals, Browns, Ravens, Redskins, Giants, Broncos and Cardinals because they all have young quarterbacks they recently drafted in the first or second round. The Colts, Titans and Buccaneers all signed quarterbacks this offseason. The Panthers cut Cam. The Bears traded for Nick Foles. The Falcons, Saints, Cowboys, Eagles, Lions, Bears, Packers, Steelers, Chiefs, Raiders, 49ers and Rams all have veteran quarterbacks. 

That leaves the Pats and Jaguars as the only possible mutual landing spots for Cam. Jacksonville wants to see what it has in Gardner Minshew and is rebuilding. The Pats always made sense, especially with the way Belichick has long revered Newton. 

"Not saying that there aren't a lot of other good players that do that, but I would say, of all the guys we play or have played recently in the last couple of years, he's the hardest guy to deal with," Belichick said back in 2017. "He makes good decisions. He can run. He's strong. He's hard to tackle. He can do a lot of different things, beat you in a lot of different ways. We saw that in the game down there in '13, so I would put him at the top of the list.

"Not saying the other guys aren't a problem, because they are, but he's Public Enemy No. 1."

Those are the kind of words reserved for one of Belichick's Guys (Ed Reed, etc). Pretty clearly, Cam is on the Belichick Crush List.

What will this offense look like?

I'm absolutely fascinated by what the Patriots are doing this offseason. They just lost Tom Brady. The greatest quarterback in the history of football "left" (in my opinion he didn't get asked back, like it was boarding school, but that's also another story for another day) and they're rebooting for the first time in the history of the greatest dynasty in sports history. 

Belichick spends all offseason making overt gestures to indicate he's ready to roll with Jarrett Stidham and then in the middle of the summer he picks up one of the most unique players the sport has ever seen for the vet minimum. 

It's so compelling and even more so when you consider how the Pats have been building this season. I'm firmly of the belief Belichick wants to run the living crap out of the ball this year, knowing an incredibly shortened and distanced offseason will make adding any sort of complex layers to his offense will make things more difficult for teams with limited amount of practices available. It makes sense -- consistency is going to be king in 2020, but if you decide to kick 20 years of consistency to the curb, the obvious next move is to make things as simple as possible.

This already was in place before Newton came into play. The Patriots didn't add a bunch of weapons in the passing game this offseason, instead deciding to toss the franchise tag on guard Joe Thuney (TBD if a deal happens, but that move is a pretty clear indication how important the run game is) and then spent two early draft picks on tight ends for the first time since 2010, picking up Devin Asiasi and Dalton Keene in the third round of the draft. Sony Michel was 2018's first-round pick and Damien Harris was a third-round pick last year; this shift has been happening longer than Belichick would like you to know. 

My personal Stidham theory involves Belichick hoping he could recreate 2001, putting a strong defense in place with a good run game and getting some game management and clutch throws out of his young quarterback. People forget, but Brady didn't come out gunning, he was a game manager who made an obscene number of clutch throws and smart decisions for the early portion of his career.

But Cam provided some very nice value and a ton of upside. And you know what makes a power run game immediately better? The threat of a quarterback who can run. If you've followed football the last 10 years you should know the math on it -- when the offense is reading a defender it becomes 11-on-10 if you run the play correctly. That's the sort of calculus/economics Belichick would probably have been involved in a decade ago if he hadn't gotten to coach Brady for 20 years. (Aside: the Pats taking Michel instead of Lamar Jackson should be an all-time NFL What If?)

So now you give him Cam Newton, a former NFL MVP and, in my mind, the greatest rushing quarterback of all time. We haven't seen peak Cam in a while, so it's easy to forget, but this was the beginning of 2018. It wasn't that long ago.

If Cam's foot is healthy and he plays 16 games -- not a given, but if -- the Patriots will steamroll this division again. Go back and watch what Josh McDaniels did when Jacoby Brissett started against Houston in 2015 while Tom Brady was serving his Deflategate suspension. They opened with read option. And then the Pats proceeded to run Brissett 10 times in that game. Jacoby Brissett is a good quarterback but he's not a fast runner. The purpose of the plan was to keep the Texans on their heels (it worked) and minimize the amount of the throws Brissett needed to make. 

McDaniels drafted Tim Tebow in the first round when he ran things in Denver. It wasn't for his passing prowess. 

Julian Edelman and N'Keal Harry aren't overpowering anyone from an air attack standpoint. But Edelman is a perfect Cam receiver. He runs tight routes and has a surprising catch radius for someone his size. Cam can cut it loose and he'll come down and keep running. Harry is red-zone monster who got unfairly dogged last year because A.J. Brown and Deebo Samuel (the latter a PERFECT Patriots player if there ever was one) blew up while Harry didn't do much for the Pats. 

If Cam is healthy the Pats are gonna have some wild stuff to work with offensively, and most if it won't force them to get out of their base offense. Go 12 personnel with two tight ends, pound the ball, run some funky stuff with Cam, score 21 points and let your defense take over. 

So what's the big takeaway?

The funny thing about Cam Newton is he spent just about every single day of his life from the moment he stepped foot on Florida's campus until now being a lightning rod. There are a million reasons and a bunch of them aren't football related. Some mom wrote a letter to a Tennessee newspaper complaining that Cam had too much fun on the field. There has never been a time in Cam Newton's football career where people didn't yell about whatever he was doing. 

And then Bill Belichick signed him. We all agreed it was a great move. 

Cam should win this job, unless a) he's not healthy or b) Stidham is a monster. Either way is a win for Belichick, because he gets a free roll with the most dynamic red zone threat to ever play professional football. A healthy Cam feels difficult because of how long it's been since we saw 16 games, but it's not far-fetched. Imagine thinking Belichick finally lost Brady and then somehow got healthy Cam for a couple seasons. The AFC East has been licking its chops for a few years now, but that hubris might have been misplaced. The boats, they might beat ceaselessly. 

Let's block ads! (Why?)



Sports - Latest - Google News
July 01, 2020 at 07:26AM
https://ift.tt/2NIWjxZ

Cam Newton to Patriots: What are his injuries, why didn't other teams sign him, how will Pats offense look? - CBS Sports
Sports - Latest - Google News
https://ift.tt/2Mbsnt7

Cam Newton to Patriots: 49ers' Richard Sherman calls former MVP's contract 'disgusting' - CBS Sports

Watch Now: Patriots Reportedly Signing Cam Newton To 1-Year Deal (7:31)

Cam Newton has a new NFL home, and that undoubtedly makes him a happy camper, but the deal itself has All-Pro cornerback Richard Sherman shaking his head. In signing with the New England Patriots, the former league MVP replaces another in the departing Tom Brady -- three months after having been released from the only organization he's known in the Carolina Panthers. As a determined Newton readies to attempt to re-establish himself as one of the best quarterbacks in the NFL, and under the tutelage of legendary coach Bill Belichick, but he'll do so on a one-year, prove-it deal.

Considering Newton's resume, Sherman finds the deal disrespectful, to say the least.

"How many former league MVPs have had to sign for the [minimum]? Asking for a friend," the San Francisco 49ers star defensive back posited on Twitter immediately following news of the signing. "Just ridiculous. A transcendent talent, and less talented QBs are getting [$15 million - $16 million] a year. Disgusting."

And he's not alone in this sentiment.

"Totally agree," said newly-retired safety Eric Weddle, in reply to Sherman's post. 

Newton's deal with the Patriots is reportedly worth upwards of $7.5 million for 2020, which is in stark contrast to the two-year, fully guaranteed $50 million deal given to Brady by the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Those two things don't exactly make for an apples-to-apples comparison though, considering the latter has six Super Bowl rings in his trophy case and opted to walk away in free agency as opposed to being released in unexpected fashion. Plus, Sherman isn't pointing at Brady's contract with his comment, or at least not directly, but more so aiming at what he feels is a lesser tier of quarterback of whom Newton is better than but earning less than.

In many ways, Sherman has a point. 

One example is Chase Daniel, a 33-year-old journeyman who signed a three-year, $13.05 million deal -- including a $2.25 million signing bonus -- this offseason with the Detroit Lions, the seventh team of his career as a backup with a 2-3 record when called upon to start. And then there's Taysom Hill, the New Orleans Saints third-string quarterback who signed a two-year deal worth $16.3 million ($8.15 million average) this offseason to sit behind a newly-signed backup in Jameis Winston, or the fact the Las Vegas Raiders are paying Marcus Mariota an average of $8.8 million over the next two seasons to play second fiddle to Derek Carr.

So forth and so on.

Few comparisons will hit home like that of Teddy Bridgewater though, who replaces Newton as the Carolina Panthers franchise quarterback on a three-year deal that averages $21 million per season, despite Bridgewater having served as the Saints backup for the last two seasons. 

For while Bridgewater has proven himself a capable starter when healthy, he doesn't have the resume of Newton. 

That said, there are also points that contradict Sherman's train of thought, at least to some degree, as there are plenty of examples over the course of NFL history wherein big-name veterans took less money on the back end of their career to have a chance at redemption. And when that shot at redemption is also tied with what could be one final chance to win a Super Bowl, it stands to reason money would be less of an issue for a player like Newton -- who has earned more than $121.39 million since being selected as the first-overall pick in 2011. 

Newton is also coming off of an injury that cost him 14 games in 2019 and considering he's battled a growing list of injuries in recent seasons, questions surrounding his durability undoubtedly entered contract talks with the Patriots, and any other club he had discussions with. 

In the end, Sherman is neither completely on nor off-base, because while there are clear examples of Newton being paid less than those who he's performed much better than en route to becoming one of the best players in Panthers history, he also carries his own set of risks that include a 6-10 combined record in this last two seasons. Still, the Patriots are paying him $6.45 million more than the league minimum for a player with his length of service, which feels like a good balance between respect for what he's done and can still be when healthy, and some apprehension surrounding his performance and durability as of late (Newton having an understanding of this when he signed). 

Did they underpay? You could argue that, or you could say other teams are overpaying their backups. 

Let's block ads! (Why?)



Sports - Latest - Google News
July 01, 2020 at 07:26AM
https://ift.tt/3geOwV0

Cam Newton to Patriots: 49ers' Richard Sherman calls former MVP's contract 'disgusting' - CBS Sports
Sports - Latest - Google News
https://ift.tt/2Mbsnt7

Cornerback Tony Grimes, ESPN's No. 6 prospect, commits to North Carolina - ESPN

North Carolina added its second five-star commitment to the 2021 recruiting class Tuesday when cornerback Tony Grimes announced his commitment to the Tar Heels.

Grimes is the No. 6-ranked prospect overall and chose North Carolina over Georgia, Ohio State and Texas A&M. He now joins five-star defensive end Keeshawn Silver as the top two commitments in the class for the Tar Heels.

"North Carolina came up big time," Grimes said. "When I say big time, they came up big time. I love the whole coaching staff, but I most definitely love Coach [Mack] Brown, Coach [Jay] Bateman and Coach Dre [Bly]. I feel like Coach Bateman is going to put me in the scheme, to put me in the right position to be great."

The 6-foot, 180-pound corner out of Princess Anne High School in Virginia Beach, Virginia, is the top-ranked corner in the class. His recruitment went back-and-forth throughout the entire process.

Grimes said Texas A&M was initially his leader, but a change in the defensive coaching staff set the Aggies back until T.J. Rushing was hired as the defensive backs coach. Ohio State then jumped up to the front, but Grimes said he was hearing only from defensive coordinator Kerry Coombs, instead of the entire defensive staff.

He preferred to build a relationship with all the coaches at each school, rather than just one, so the Buckeyes fell behind after he didn't get that experience.

"Then UNC snuck up and they held the lead," Grimes said. "But then I went and visited Georgia and it was amazing, so Georgia jumped in. It was shifting around, but then I started thinking more about it that I thought I could be great at UNC, and it was only three hours away so I could get back to my family."

The Tar Heels had a lot of what Grimes was looking for, but the coaches also spent a lot of time building a relationship with the five-star recruit. He got the chance to talk with most of the defensive coaches and felt a special connection to Brown, Bateman and Bly.

"Coach Mack Brown, he's going to love me; he's going to coach me hard, but he's going to love me harder," Grimes said. "Coach Dre, that's my dude and I know me and my family can trust those three like any other coaching staff. Not throwing any salt on any other coaching staff, but we have more trust and loyalty in them than we saw in any other program."

Grimes also said the Tar Heels' most recent season was a big factor in his decision. That the staff was able to take mostly the same roster, add in some of their own recruits, and turn it into a winning program was impressive to Grimes and his family. It gave him the confidence he needed to choose North Carolina, and he is now the third five-star commitment for Brown and his staff over the past two recruiting classes, joining Silver and defensive end Desmond Evans from the 2020 class.

Prior to the commitment, North Carolina held the No. 4-ranked recruiting class overall behind Ohio State, Tennessee and Clemson. With Grimes on board, the Tar Heels now have 12 ESPN 300 commitments, which is the most North Carolina has had in one class since ESPN started its rankings in 2009.

While the Tar Heels added a big name to their 2021 recruiting cycle, there is a chance they could add Grimes to the roster sooner rather than later. He plans to enroll early in January, but is still monitoring whether his high school team will have its season canceled due to the coronavirus pandemic.

If the season is canceled, there is a chance Grimes will reclassify to the 2020 class and join North Carolina early.

"If we don't have a high school football season, as of right now, I will be enrolling at North Carolina in August," Grimes said. "They're talking about pushing our season back to the spring and I'll be going early anyway, so me and my dad decided I would go in August if that happens. I only need to take one class and I'll be able to do it."

Let's block ads! (Why?)



Sports - Latest - Google News
July 01, 2020 at 04:28AM
https://ift.tt/2ZpR8IH

Cornerback Tony Grimes, ESPN's No. 6 prospect, commits to North Carolina - ESPN
Sports - Latest - Google News
https://ift.tt/2Mbsnt7

White House says Trump has been briefed on alleged Russian bounties on U.S. troops - CBS Evening News

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

  1. White House says Trump has been briefed on alleged Russian bounties on U.S. troops  CBS Evening News
  2. Suspicions of Russian Bounties Were Bolstered by Data on Financial Transfers  The New York Times
  3. Trump says reports that Russia paid Taliban to kill U.S. troops were not "credible"  CBS News
  4. Russian bounty hunting: Trump's latest scandal | TheHill  The Hill
  5. Rep. Jim Banks: Russian bounties to Taliban story may be putting US lives at risk — here's how  Fox News
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News


World - Latest - Google News
July 01, 2020 at 06:01AM
https://ift.tt/31Jd2cX

White House says Trump has been briefed on alleged Russian bounties on U.S. troops - CBS Evening News
World - Latest - Google News
https://ift.tt/2SeTG7d

Rockies' Ian Desmond opting out of playing in 2020, citing high risk amid pandemic - ESPN

Ian Desmond will opt out of playing this season, the Colorado Rockies outfielder announced Monday.

"The COVID-19 pandemic has made this baseball season one that is a risk I am not comfortable taking," he wrote at the end of a lengthy post on Instagram that touched on race and opportunities for youth baseball players.

"With a pregnant wife and four young children who have lots of questions about what's going on in the world, home is where I need to be right now,'' Desmond wrote. "Home for my wife, Chelsey. Home to help. Home to guide. Home to answer my older three boys' questions about Coronavirus and Civil Rights and life. Home to be their Dad.''

Desmond, who grew up in Sarasota, Florida, made his major league debut with Washington in 2009. The two-time All-Star played for Texas for one season before signing with the Rockies.

In his Instagram post, Desmond said he has been sharing more of his thoughts and experiences as a biracial man since George Floyd's death on May 25 in Minnesota. Floyd, a Black man, died after a white police officer kneeled on his neck for more than seven minutes.

Desmond said his mind started racing during a recent visit to the Sarasota baseball fields that he played on as a kid. He wrote about how they looked run down and neglected and how important youth baseball was for him growing up.

"Why can't we support teaching the game to all kids -- but especially those in underprivileged communities?'' Desmond wrote. "Why aren't accessible, affordable youth sports viewed as an essential opportunity to affect kids' development, as opposed to money-making propositions and recruiting chances? It's hard to wrap your head around it.''

Desmond said he wants to help Sarasota Youth Baseball get back on track. "It's what I can do, in the scheme of so much,'' he wrote. "So, I am.''

Desmond has played 11 seasons, the past three with the Rockies. He batted .255 with 20 home runs and 65 RBIs in 140 games in 2019.

Desmond had been due $5,555,556 for the prorated share of his $15 million salary, part of a $70 million, five-year contract, according to The Associated Press. He is owed $8 million next year, and his deal includes a $15 million team option for 2022 with a $2 million buyout.

Earlier Monday, Arizona Diamondbacks pitcher Mike Leake and Washington Nationals first baseman Ryan Zimmerman and pitcher Joe Ross announced that they are opting out of the 2020 season amid the coronavirus pandemic.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Let's block ads! (Why?)



Sports - Latest - Google News
June 30, 2020 at 10:40AM
https://ift.tt/31GegWn

Rockies' Ian Desmond opting out of playing in 2020, citing high risk amid pandemic - ESPN
Sports - Latest - Google News
https://ift.tt/2Mbsnt7

Russia bounty intelligence 'may have been' in Trump brief but wasn't deemed 'actionable,' senior Republican says - NBC News

WASHINGTON — The Trump administration told Republican members of Congress on Monday that intelligence about potential Russian bounties may have been included at some point in the President's Daily Brief but not conveyed to President Donald Trump in a formal threat briefing because it wasn't yet "actionable," the top Republican on the House Foreign Affairs Committee said.

"I believe it may have been" in the written President's Daily Brief, or PDB, Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Texas, said in an interview.

Referring to the president, McCaul said: "I think the way the process works is that he gets briefed about three times a week on sort of actionable, credible items. And the decision was made that this was not at that point in time a credible, actionable piece of intelligence. And if at any point it did, it would be raised to his attention."

McCaul was one of eight House Republicans briefed in the Situation Room of the White House on Monday by the White House chief of staff, national security adviser and national intelligence director. A group of eight House Democrats was set to receive a similar briefing Tuesday morning.

The White House has insisted that Trump never received a "briefing" about intelligence indicating that Russia offered bounties to Afghan militants to kill U.S. and coalition troops. But both the White House and the national intelligence director's office have declined to say whether the information was in the PDB, the highly classified document produced for the president and other top officials, prompting speculation that Trump may simply have not read his briefing materials.

June 30, 202007:57

McCaul, who said he emerged from the briefing with deep concerns that the intelligence may be correct, said lawmakers were told that no U.S. service members had died as a result of Russia's paying Afghan militants to kill them.

"Their answer was no," McCaul said. "The intelligence had come out in January. It's right around the time of peace talks" in which the U.S. was negotiating with the Taliban for a temporary reduction in violence as a precursor to a broader political settlement.

The remarks add to deepening confusion about whether a Russian bounty offer was ever acted upon and when the U.S. learned about it. An official familiar with the intelligence said it showed that U.S. troops and Afghan civilians did die as a result, although other officials have indicated that that hasn't been corroborated. The Associated Press reported late Monday that the White House learned of the intelligence in early 2019, a year earlier than other reports have indicated.

Since the allegations erupted in the media, Trump has asserted that the intelligence community didn't find it credible. But in another indication that the national security community apparently took the intelligence seriously, McCaul said the Trump administration officials disclosed that changes had been made in protocols to protect U.S. service members operating in the region, known as "force protection," in response.

"They did stress that fact that they did everything possible to protect our forces over there," McCaul said. "And the record, according to them, the fact no one had been killed, you know, I think speaks to that."

Download the NBC News app for breaking news and politics

Still, McCaul and other Republicans left the hearing calling for swift action to respond if the intelligence is corroborated. McCaul said that if the allegations prove true, the U.S. should impose heavy sanctions on the GRU, the Russian military intelligence unit implicated by the intelligence.

McCaul also said any discussion about allowing Russia back into the Group of 7 nations "should be off the table." Trump has repeatedly advocated for allowing President Vladimir Putin back into the club of nations, from which he was expelled in 2014 in response to Russia's annexation of Crimea.

June 29, 202001:34

The House Republicans were told that the National Security Council was vetting the intelligence after various intelligence agencies disagreed about its veracity, McCaul said, with one intelligence agency, which he didn't identify, having filed a "dissenting view."

Still, several months have passed since the intelligence first came in, and McCaul acknowledged that it was unclear whether the NSC had been actively validating or seeking more information before the allegations became public in a New York Times article, triggering massive public pressure for answers.

"That's a very good question. What they told me that was that they had been in the process of vetting through the NSC," McCaul said. He added that CIA Director Gina Haspel and John Ratcliffe, the director of national intelligence, were embarking on a "scrub of all the intelligence data out there to check for the veracity and credibility."

Ken Dilanian, Carol E. Lee, Courtney Kube and Kristen Welker contributed.

Let's block ads! (Why?)



World - Latest - Google News
June 30, 2020 at 01:37PM
https://ift.tt/2NKpqkk

Russia bounty intelligence 'may have been' in Trump brief but wasn't deemed 'actionable,' senior Republican says - NBC News
World - Latest - Google News
https://ift.tt/2SeTG7d

China passes national security law for Hong Kong: report - Fox News

U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo spoke out against China’s threat to restrict visas for Americans prior to Beijing increasing its grip on Hong Kong after reportedly passing a security law that critics say undermines the semi-autonomous territory’s judicial independence.

FOX BUSINESS: US ENDING SPECIAL TREATMENT OF HONG KONG

Beijing passed the national security law that the Hong Kong media says will allow Beijing to crack down on any activity there that authorities deem subversive with secessionist aims.

“If China wants to regain the trust of Hong Kongers and the international community, it should honor the promises it made to the Hong Kong people and to the United Kingdom in the U.N.-registered 1984 Sino-British Joint Declaration,” Pompeo’s statement read.

The administration has warned for weeks that if the law was passed, it would take action to end special U.S. trade and commercial preferences Hong Kong had enjoyed since reverting to Chinese rule in 1997.

Tam Yiu-Chung, Hong Kong's sole representative to the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress, confirmed to reporters Tuesday that the law had been passed. He said punishments would not include the death penalty, but did not elaborate on further details such as whether the law could be applied retroactively.

"We hope the law will serve as a deterrent to prevent people from stirring up trouble," Tam said in the interview. "Don't let Hong Kong be used as a tool to split the country."

Carrie Lam, Hong Kong leader,  said it was not appropriate for her to comment on the new law while there continues to be a discussion about the ramifications, Reuters reported.

A crowd of several hundred opponents of the bill gathered for what was planned as a “silent protest” in the Kowloon district while armed riot police kept watch, Reuters reported.

Protesters ignored police warnings to disperse and began chanting slogans, police said on Facebook. Pepper spray was used to break up the crowd after some protesters charged at police lines in a street of Mong Kok, according to police.

Police said 53 protesters were arrested and charged with unlawful assembly.

GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“We can no longer distinguish between the export of controlled items to Hong Kong or to mainland China,” Pompeo said earlier. “We cannot risk these items falling into the hands of the People’s Liberation Army, whose primary purpose is to uphold the dictatorship of the (ruling Communist Party) by any means necessary.”

Fox News’ Stephen Sorace and the Associated Press contributed to this report

Let's block ads! (Why?)



World - Latest - Google News
June 30, 2020 at 01:37PM
https://ift.tt/2BpV04p

China passes national security law for Hong Kong: report - Fox News
World - Latest - Google News
https://ift.tt/2SeTG7d

Featured Post

Qatar 'appalled' by reported criticism from Israel's Netanyahu - BBC.com

By David Gritten BBC News Reuters Qatar's foreign ministry said the Israeli prime minister's reported remarks were ...

Popular Posts